|
Jim
|
 |
« on: September 20, 2013, 08:11:59 PM » |
|
Ive not read it yet but apparently the reclusive, rarely seen ms Dyble has been tracked down on p60 of the new edition of Mojo magazine.
which beggars the question, who is that woman who holds court at Cropredy?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
The Dude abides
|
|
|
|
jude
|
|
« Reply #1 on: September 20, 2013, 08:23:31 PM » |
|
Ive not read it yet but apparently the reclusive, rarely seen ms Dyble has been tracked down on p60 of the new edition of Mojo magazine.
which beggars the question, who is that woman who holds court at Cropredy?
Oh her.. She's the Official one. I however am the Mysterious Reclusive one, who is a Lost Woman of Folk. Which is strange because I always knew where I was..  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Jim
|
|
« Reply #2 on: September 20, 2013, 09:20:35 PM » |
|
Ive not read it yet but apparently the reclusive, rarely seen ms Dyble has been tracked down on p60 of the new edition of Mojo magazine.
which beggars the question, who is that woman who holds court at Cropredy?
Oh her.. She's the Official one. I however am the Mysterious Reclusive one, who is a Lost Woman of Folk. Which is strange because I always knew where I was.. I have read the article now and I put it to you, Jude, that you and her are in fact..................................... the same person! M'lud i rest my case |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
The Dude abides
|
|
|
|
jude
|
|
« Reply #3 on: September 20, 2013, 09:28:10 PM » |
|
Ive not read it yet but apparently the reclusive, rarely seen ms Dyble has been tracked down on p60 of the new edition of Mojo magazine.
which beggars the question, who is that woman who holds court at Cropredy?
Oh her.. She's the Official one. I however am the Mysterious Reclusive one, who is a Lost Woman of Folk. Which is strange because I always knew where I was.. I have read the article now and I put it to you, Jude, that you and her are in fact..................................... the same person! M'lud i rest my case Oh all right. I admit it. But as I haven't read the article yet (waiting to get a copy) I have no idea what's been written.. Have I been found then? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
bassline (Mike)
|
|
« Reply #4 on: September 20, 2013, 09:31:30 PM » |
|
I always thought that when I saw them both shopping every year at Cropredy,it was the 6X that was doing it,but you tell me Judy Dyble IS Judy's double?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Well I never did..
|
|
|
|
Poor Will (Bill)
|
|
« Reply #5 on: September 20, 2013, 11:40:29 PM » |
|
But have you ever seen them both in the same room?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
In the words of the Zen Master " Don't just do something, sit there"
|
|
|
|
jude
|
|
« Reply #6 on: September 21, 2013, 07:40:51 AM » |
|
I always thought that when I saw them both shopping every year at Cropredy,it was the 6X that was doing it,but you tell me Judy Dyble IS Judy's double?
But have you ever seen them both in the same room?
Figment of your fevered imaginations.....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dave.P
stay away from hammers
Folkcorp Guru
 Offline
Posts: 618
Loc: Isle of Wight
Dave from USA (Uther Side of Andover)
|
|
« Reply #7 on: September 25, 2013, 06:13:01 PM » |
|
I never thought that you lost your Mojo Jude... Reports of sightings may be greatly exaggerated ... I'm sure it was always with you |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jamie73
|
|
« Reply #9 on: September 26, 2013, 10:18:02 AM » |
|
Can you still look forward to your anthology coming out, Judy?
Jamie
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Reg
|
|
« Reply #10 on: September 26, 2013, 11:26:25 AM » |
|
But have you ever seen them both in the same room?
Many people have seen them in the same field, after too much 6x. I saw 3 Simon Nicols once. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
There's a man with a mullet going mad with a mallet in Millets
|
|
|
Philip W
forgiving of the rhetorical flourish
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 444
Loc: Cambs
|
|
« Reply #11 on: September 26, 2013, 01:19:29 PM » |
|
It's a good article, but why oh why do they illustrate these pieces exclusively with old photos? It's the same with the article on Shelagh McDonald in the same issue. By contrast, we're treated (over several pages) to Macca in all his 71-year-old glory. I'm sure Harriet Harman would have something to say about this differential treatment, were she a Mojo reader.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
davidmjs
|
|
« Reply #12 on: September 26, 2013, 02:29:21 PM » |
|
It's a good article, but why oh why do they illustrate these pieces exclusively with old photos? It's the same with the article on Shelagh McDonald in the same issue. By contrast, we're treated (over several pages) to Macca in all his 71-year-old glory. I'm sure Harriet Harman would have something to say about this differential treatment, were she a Mojo reader.
A good point, well made, Philip. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.
|
|
|
|
jude
|
|
« Reply #13 on: September 26, 2013, 03:30:26 PM » |
|
It's a good article, but why oh why do they illustrate these pieces exclusively with old photos? It's the same with the article on Shelagh McDonald in the same issue. By contrast, we're treated (over several pages) to Macca in all his 71-year-old glory. I'm sure Harriet Harman would have something to say about this differential treatment, were she a Mojo reader.
A good point, well made, Philip. It does depend a lot on what pictures one sends in.... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Philip W
forgiving of the rhetorical flourish
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 444
Loc: Cambs
|
|
« Reply #14 on: September 26, 2013, 04:10:27 PM » |
|
It's a good article, but why oh why do they illustrate these pieces exclusively with old photos? It's the same with the article on Shelagh McDonald in the same issue. By contrast, we're treated (over several pages) to Macca in all his 71-year-old glory. I'm sure Harriet Harman would have something to say about this differential treatment, were she a Mojo reader.
A good point, well made, Philip. It does depend a lot on what pictures one sends in.... Ah, I stand corrected, Judy. Apologies. I know, in Shelagh's case, the journalist pointed them towards up-to-date photos of her (and very lovely she looks too) but the mag preferred to go with the old familiar Keith Morris pictures taken when she was a young lass. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
